Is "kindly find attached" professional in English emails?

"Kindly find attached" is grammatically correct, and it's standard business English across India and much of the outsourced business world. But US, UK, and Canadian native speakers never write it. To a native ear it sounds like 1980s office correspondence — formal, stiff, and a little impersonal. The professional move with international colleagues and clients is to drop it and just name what you sent: "I've attached the report" or "Here's the invoice."

"Kindly" and "herewith" make it worse. They stack up old-fashioned signals that quietly mark the writer as non-native even when the rest of the message is sharp. Natives reach for something plainer and warmer: they say what they've sent and move on.

The fix is one sentence. Instead of pointing the reader to "find" an attachment, tell them you attached it.

Examples

Name what you sent instead of using the clerical catch-all phrase:

Common mistakes

• Using "kindly find attached" as the default way to introduce an attachment.
• Adding "herewith" or "please find attached herewith", which doubles down on the dated tone.
• Tacking on "for your reference", which reads as stiff where a plain "take a look" feels natural.

Quick summary

• "Kindly find attached" is correct, but US/UK/Canadian natives never write it — it reads as dated, clerical English.
• Name what you sent instead: "I've attached the report" or "Here's the invoice."
• Drop "kindly", "herewith", and "for your reference" — they stack up signals that mark you as non-native.
• A warm, plain pointer ("take a look") beats a formal one ("for your reference").

Related guides

• “Revert back to me” — say “get back to me”
• “Your good name” — say “your name”
• “Do the needful” — name the action